America, You Asked For It!

Political News and Commentary from the Right

Not yet a long enough “train of abuses and usurpations”…

by John Allison III, editor

…but Democrats are promising more.

The following is part of the second paragraph of the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.

Tomorrow, it appears the US House of Representatives will vote for President Obama’s government takeover of the US health care system, not only without consent, but AGAINST THE WILL of the governed!

This planned redistribution of wealth is destructive to Americans’ pursuit of happiness by punishing the successful to reward the unsuccessful. The expansion of government power to mandate the purchase of health insurance will destroy Americans’ liberty to choose what type of health insurance to purchase, or not to purchase it at all. And in the end, as evidenced by those foreign nationals who leave their countries with nationalized health care to have their conditions treated here, Americans’ right to life will be sacrificed as wait times are increased for receiving life saving treatments and patients die as a result.

Tomorrow’s vote, if the Democrats succeed will mark the day our government became “destructive to these ends.” Our rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness will have all been denied by a narcissistic demagogue whose personal mission more and more seems to be the destruction of the American way of life.

While I am not yet ready to proclaim the past 14 months constitute the “long train of abuses and usurpations” that demands we “throw off such government,” we are certainly moving in that direction. The lavish spending, government seizure of private industry, and complete abandonment of representation of the electorate indeed constitute abuses and usurpations evincing a design to reduce us under the “absolute despotism” of the Democrat Party leadership.

Nancy Pelosi has promised even more changes to the health care system after she “kicks through this door,” or gets this first health care bill to pass. The American people have jammed the phone lines on Capitol Hill, assailed their Congressmen at town hall meetings, and participated in record breaking protests to unequivocally communicate their opposition to the Obama/Democrat agenda. That opposition didn’t begin with the health care debate, it began with Obama’s earliest initiatives.

The American people have stood together to oppose TARP, the auto industry bailouts, cap & trade, cash-for-clunkers, record deficits, bloated budgets, unprecedented levels of national debt, and Obamacare. The entire Obama agenda has been opposed, and that opposition has been ignored time and again. “The consent of the governed” isn’t even a consideration of this administration, or its enforcers in the US House and Senate.

For fourteen months our unalienable rights have been ignored and usurped, with Democrat promises of more to come. Fourteen months is not yet long enough to constitute the “long train” that will demand we take more drastic action.

Not yet, but they’re promising more.

March 20, 2010 Posted by | Health Care | , , , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Democrats to Americans–“We don’t give a damn what you want!”

After a year of ignoring the growing grassroots protest movement that sprung up last year, after crashing in polls across the nation for months, and after stinging election losses in New Jersey, Virginia, and Massachusetts, Democrats undoubtedly understand the message being communicated by a disillusioned but indefatigable electorate. But it has never been more clear they don’t care what We the People want, they have no intention of bending to our will.

“This isn’t the change America wanted!” is the clear message that only those who never watch or read the news don’t understand. The Tea Party, the 9-12 movement, and the overall resurgence of conservatism in the country today would not have metasticized except in opposition to President Barack Obama and the Democrats’ rush to burden the American people with the yoke of Socialism.

But after all the protests, calls and emails to representatives and senators, and even their precipitous drop in polls from coast to coast, Democrats in Washington continue to forge ahead on the path to Obamacare–the plank in Obama’s platform most detested by the American people. The message is clear, and it isn’t going unheard.

The message is being ignored!

Two hundred and thirty four years ago, our forefathers were slaves to their government. They responded with revolution.

The Declaration of Independence enumerates the reasons they chose to abandon their ruler and form their own country, now our own country. Within the preamble to that famous document we find part of the foundation of their decision to revolt is once again suffered by We the People.

…Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

*Emphasis added

That a strong majority of the people are opposed to a government takeover of our health care system is undeniable. Obama and his Democrat henchmen in the US House and Senate have tried to put lipstick on their pig several times, but a large majority of Americans still recognize it as a pig and continue to oppose Obamacare.

Everyone thought Democrats had finally learned their lesson last month after they lost the un-losable US Senate seat Ted Kennedy had so long occupied. Obama himself even uttered the words on camera. “The Senate certainly shouldn’t try to jam anything through until Scott Brown is seated. People in Massachusetts spoke. He’s got to be part of that process,” said the President following the historic GOP victory in Massachusetts.

Most considered the House and Senate bills dead at that point. But Obama didn’t mean the Senate shouldn’t try to jam anything through, he meant to wait until Scott Brown was seated AND THEN jam something through!

Now it appears they’re ready to do just that. Harry Reid (D-NV) said yesterday the Senate will force a bill through within 60 days, in spite of overwhelming opposition by the American people.

Through a process known as reconciliation, designed to be used only for budget bills, the Senate needs only 51 votes and steer clear of a filibuster. Republicans are crying foul because the 2000 + page bill isn’t a budget bill and doesn’t qualify for that process. In a letter to Obama this month, House Majority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Minority Whip Eric Cantor (R-VA)told the President “`Bipartisanship’ is not writing proposals of your own behind closed doors, then unveiling them and demanding Republican support.”

The President’s calls for, and promises of bipartisanship were nothing but a sham. Designed to bolster his crashing approval ratings and possibly stem the flow of Democrats’ political bleeding across the country, he met with Republicans last month and called for a Health Care Summit with Republicans that will take place on Thursday. But even some Democrats admit it’s all for show.

Buried way down deep in a New York Times article“There’s hope for a breakthrough here, but the odds of that are not very good,” said a top Democratic aide who has worked for years on health care. “This is a media event.” In the same article, some Democrats expressed doubt the Senate can get even 51 votes to pass the bill in reconciliation. But they also expressed the opinion that Obama may be able to sway enough to cross the hurdle.

Democrats have no intention of compromising, and their leaders in Congress and the White House have no intention of “deriving their powers by the consent of the governed.” Instead they exercise their power in spite of the will of the governed.

If they pass this bill, after all that has transpired these last few months, they will be saying to the American people “We don’t give a damn what you want!”

February 21, 2010 Posted by | Health Care | , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

What’s wrong with Obama’s 4th of July Message?

In his first Independence Day message to his supporters, the President demonstrated his fundamental misunderstanding of what is probably the most well known sentence of the Declaration of Independence.  That’s giving Obama the benefit of the doubt, because the alternative is he’s intentionally misinterpreting the intent of the founders to manipulate the people and consolidate power.

From the Declaration of Independence:

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

President Obama’s interpretation seems to ignore that little word wedged between ‘the’ and ‘of’–pursuit.

Now, it’s important to remember this document wasn’t put together in a day.  It wasn’t something Jefferson put together in one sitting on a cafe napkin.  Jefferson and the other founding fathers carefully chose their words to ensure their message to the King and the world was communicated effectively.  The phrase “pursuit of happiness,” survived the editing process and became permanently etched in the final document that initiated the formation of what would become the greatest nation on Earth.

From the President’s 4th of July message:

Our country began as a unique experiment in liberty — a bold, evolving quest to achieve a more perfect union. And in every generation, another courageous group of patriots has taken us one step closer to fully realizing the dream our founders enshrined on that great day.

Read that paragraph carefully.

The first sentence references the lead phrase in the US Constitution.  Our founding fathers sought to form a more perfect union, but the current President seems to interpret this as the dream of the perfect union.  Our wise founders, by inserting that little adverb “more” into this sentence, recognized that perfection is unachievable.  Some may have believed such an achievement is unattainable due to the fallibility of man, others may have based their belief on the understanding that each man has a different definition of the “perfect” state.  But one thing is clear–the editors of Jefferson’s draft would have struck the word ‘more‘ if they wished to communicate that they sought the perfect union.

Our founding fathers made clear their belief that the guarantee of personal freedom was the most important role of government.  These great patriots recognized that the freedom to excel must be complemented by the freedom to fail.  Their acknowledgment that man has an inalienable right to pursue happiness rather than attain happiness seems incomprehensible to our current President.  The President and his Democratic lackeys in Congress believe the founders had it all wrong.  In their minds, your personal freedom creates inequities in society that can only be corrected by regulation and legislation.

Where the founders believed in an individual’s right to the fruits of his labors, Obama and his ilk would have you believe the role of government is to equalize the distribution of those fruits among the populace.  In their world, the man who works overtime or even two jobs to afford a larger house, a newer car, better health insurance, or even to treat his family to a vacation once in a while should be brought down to the same economic status as the man who chooses to work part-time, or not at all, so that he can sit on the sofa and watch Oprah or Dr. Phil.  Rather than allow each individual to strive for his definition of economic success, Obama and his Socialist pals want to define success and, through regulation and legislation, force all Americans to fit that mold.

Another paragraph from the President’s message:

As free people, we must each take the challenges and opportunities that face this nation as our own. As long as some Americans still must struggle, none of us can be fully content. And as America comes ever closer to achieving the perfect Union our founders dreamed, that triumph — that pride — belongs to all of us.

There it is again–the perfect union.  This is repetitive I know, but it seems our President can’t grasp such a simple concept so I’ll go on.

I don’t know about you, but I’m not acquainted with anyone who hasn’t struggled at some point in their lives.  I’m sure they exist, but they’re few and far between.  Again, the founders’ understanding that no such “perfect union” could exist is evidenced in the Constitution by the little adverb “more.”  They didn’t dream of a perfect union in the Utopian sense, they dreamed of a “more perfect union“–meaning better than the one that existed at the time.   To create a perfect union would require the existence of a perfect human being(s) and I believe the Bible when it says there is no such thing.

The President has described the Constitution as a document of “negative liberties” and he’s right, if you believe the Constitution was written to guarantee rights to our federal government.  However, the fact is the Constitution wasn’t written to secure the rights of government, but the rights of the governed.  It follows then, what the President views as “negative liberties” granted the federal government become simply “liberties” enjoyed by citizens.

Those liberties, especially the right to be as successful as one chooses, are precisely what allowed the United States to become the greatest nation–the most charitable, the most innovative, the most powerful–on Earth in less than 200 years.  Remove those liberties, through taxation, legislation, or regulation, and we may well achieve economic equality for all.  But at what price?

The cost of such equalization will be borne by all Americans.  Innovation will evaporate.  When the prospect of reaping the financial rewards for building a better mousetrap is stripped from our society, we’ll be stuck with the mousetraps of today.  Our health care system may be expensive, but we’re paying for the innovation that continually  increases the lifespan of our citizens.  The President and his cronies are currently hyping a government system that will eliminate the financial rewards for such innovation and result in the stagnation of medical discoveries, thereby stifling advances that would continue to increase longevity in the future.

Obama’s 4th of July message implies that his reforms will move us closer to a “perfect” union, one in which all our countrymen are guaranteed an equal share of the nation’s economic pie.  The end result of such ideology will be a reduction in the size of that pie so that all Americans will have a smaller portion, but they’ll all be equal.  This was not the founders’ intent.

The system envisioned in 1776 rewarded hard work and personal responsibility. The President and Democrats in Congress seek to reward the opposite by punishing those traits so valued by our founding fathers.

It seems the founders, or at least Benjamin Franklin, knew this day would come.

“When the people find they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic.”–Benjamin Franklin

John Allison III
Cabot, AR
Visit MyBlogLog and get a signature like this!

July 5, 2009 Posted by | Constitution, Obama | , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.